Published on: | by

People now ask ChatGPT and Claude everything, including what to do after an arrest, whether the police can prove a case, and how to explain suspicious facts. If you have been accused of a crime, that can be a serious mistake. A recent federal court opinion shows why people should be very cautious before typing case facts, strategy, timelines, or explanations into a consumer AI platform.

A recent opinion from the Southern District of New York, United States v. Heppner, addressed whether a criminal defendant’s communications with the AI platform Claude were protected by the attorney-client privilege or the work-product doctrine. On the facts before it, the court said no.  The Harvard Law Review’s discussion of the decision is worth reading, and helped inspire this article.

The practical lesson is straightforward. AI is not your lawyer. A public AI platform is not the same thing as a confidential legal channel. If you are under investigation, worried about charges, or already facing prosecution, you should assume that discussing your case with AI can create risks your lawyer would rather have avoided.

Continue Reading ›

Published on: | by

A Michigan OWI or DUI can create serious consequences in a pilot DUI case even before there is a conviction, because the FAA treats some alcohol-related license suspensions, revocations, and later convictions as separate reportable events. For many pilots, the real danger is not only the criminal case, but the combination of FAA reporting duties, medical-application disclosure duties, and the risk that a recent or more serious alcohol-related event will delay or complicate medical clearance.

Why a Pilot DUI Can Threaten More Than a Driver’s License

Michigan DUI consequences for pilots and FAA reporting requirementsMany pilots assume the only question is whether they will be convicted in Michigan court. That is too narrow. The FAA separates pilot certificate issues from medical certification issues, and a single incident can create problems in both systems.

Continue Reading ›

Published on: | by

Michigan’s Health Professional Recovery Program, known as HPRP, is a monitoring program that HPRP Michigan healthcare professionals encounter most often after a criminal charge raises the question of an underlying substance use or mental health disorder. It is described as voluntary and non-disciplinary. In practice it functions more like a condition of continued licensure, and the Monitoring Agreement it requires is a notarized legal document that can govern every aspect of a practitioner’s professional and personal life for years. In practice, it functions more like a condition of continued licensure, and the Monitoring Agreement it requires is a notarized legal document that can govern every aspect of a practitioner’s professional and personal life for years.

HPRP Michigan healthcare professionals facing licensing consequences after OWI arrestThe decision to enter HPRP, and when to enter, is among the most consequential decisions a Michigan healthcare professional can make after an alcohol or drug-related charge. It should never be made without coordination between a criminal defense attorney and a healthcare licensing attorney.

When Does a Criminal Charge Put HPRP Michigan Healthcare Professionals at Risk?

Continue Reading ›

Published on: | by

Most people facing a Michigan OWI arrest ask the same question: when should I hire a DUI attorney in Michigan? The honest answer is that there is no letter in the mail that signals it is time to act, and for most clients there is no single deadline that forces the decision. What there is instead is a gap between the arrest and the first court date that feels like waiting but is actually an opportunity. The attorneys at the Barone Defense Firm use that time to build the foundation of your defense, and clients who give them that time consistently have more options than those who come in after the case has already started moving.

Why Is It Hard to Take Action After an OWI Arrest?

Being arrested is a jarring, disorienting experience, and the days that follow often produce a kind of stillness that can be difficult to explain. It is not indifference. It is the very human response to having your sense of normal suddenly disrupted, and to facing a situation that feels too large and too uncertain to approach directly.

Continue Reading ›

Published on: | by

You have the right to refuse field sobriety tests in Michigan, and the refusal carries no license sanctions and no criminal penalties. But the decision involves tradeoffs that most people facing this choice do not fully understand. A 2016 Michigan statute changed the admissibility framework for these tests, Michigan case law has established that refusal can be used to support probable cause for your arrest, and prosecutors may argue your refusal as evidence of consciousness of guilt at trial. The right question to ask is not simply whether you can refuse. The question is whether you should, given the specific facts of your stop and the legal landscape that now surrounds that choice.

What Are Field Sobriety Tests and Why Do They Matter in a Michigan OWI Case?

Field sobriety tests are roadside assessments an officer uses to observe your physical and cognitive performance before making an arrest decision. In an alcohol-impaired driving investigation, Michigan recognizes three standardized field sobriety tests endorsed by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration: the horizontal gaze nystagmus test, the walk and turn, and the one leg stand. These are the tests an officer will administer during a typical roadside alcohol investigation and the ones at issue in the vast majority of OWI arrests.

Continue Reading ›

Published on: | by

A Michigan implied consent hearing is an administrative proceeding before a Secretary of State administrative law judge, entirely separate from and independent of the criminal OWI case. The officer who made the arrest must appear and prove four specific elements under the civil preponderance standard, not the beyond-a-reasonable-doubt standard that applies in criminal court. If the officer fails to appear, or establish any one of those four elements, the license suspension is dismissed entirely, as if the refusal never happened.

What Is a Michigan Implied Consent Hearing and Why Does It Exist?

Michigan implied consent hearing at the Secretary of State administrative officeMichigan’s implied consent law rests on a legal fiction: by accepting a Michigan driver’s license, a person is deemed to have consented in advance to a chemical test if lawfully arrested for OWI. But that fictional consent cannot operate as a legitimate exception to the Fourth Amendment’s warrant requirement until it comes into actual existence. It does so only when the officer reads the prescribed chemical test rights advisement following a lawful arrest, and the driver is given a genuine opportunity to either reaffirm that consent by submitting to the test or withdraw it by refusing. Until that advisement is given, there is no actual consent, only the legal fiction of it, and a fiction alone cannot satisfy the Fourth Amendment.

Continue Reading ›

Published on: | by

A Michigan breath test refusal is not a single decision. It is two separate questions with two separate answers, because Michigan law treats the roadside preliminary breath test and the evidentiary breath test at the police station as fundamentally different instruments governed by different statutes with different consequences for refusal. Understanding that distinction is the most important thing a Michigan driver can know before they are ever put in the position of having to decide.

What Is the Difference Between the PBT and the Evidentiary Breath Test in a Michigan DUI?

Michigan law recognizes two categories of breath test in a DUI investigation. The first is the preliminary breath test, or PBT, a small handheld device an officer asks you to blow into at the roadside before any arrest has been made. The second is the evidentiary breath test, administered on the Intoxilyzer 9000 at the police station after you have been placed under arrest.

Continue Reading ›

Published on: | by

Yes, hiring an experienced Michigan DUI attorney is worth it even when your case looks bad, and in many respects it is worth it most when your case looks bad. A breath test result above the legal limit, a high BAC reading, a prior record, or the involvement of an accident does not make a case unwinnable. It makes a case more complex, and complexity is where the gap between a trained specialist and a general practitioner is widest. The Barone Defense Firm never assumes a breath test result is reliable or even admissible. Every case begins with a complete investigation of the evidence, regardless of how it first appears.

Michigan OWI attorney serving clients in courts across the state of MichiganWhat Does a Bad Case Michigan DUI Actually Look Like to a Defense Attorney?

A case that looks bad to a defendant, and sometimes to a general practitioner, often looks very different to an attorney with deep scientific training and years of experience examining the specific evidence that Michigan OWI prosecutions depend on. The charging document describes what the officer observed and what the instruments reported.

Continue Reading ›

Published on: | by

A third DUI arrest in Michigan is a felony under Heidi’s Law, a Class E felony carrying one to five years in prison, mandatory minimum jail time, and a license revocation measured in years rather than months. It does not matter when your prior convictions occurred. Two DUI convictions from thirty years ago can transform today’s arrest into a felony.

That is the weight of what you are facing. It is also not the end of the story. An arrest is not a conviction, and the outcome of a third-offense Michigan DUI case depends heavily on decisions made in the days and weeks immediately following the arrest. If you are facing a Heidi’s Law Michigan DUI charge, the decisions you make right now will shape every outcome that follows.

What Is Heidi’s Law and How Does It Affect Your Michigan DUI Case?

Continue Reading ›

Published on: | by

If you were arrested for DUI or OWI within the cities of Birmingham, Bloomfield Hills, Keego Harbor, Sylvan Lake, or Orchard Lake Village, or the townships of Bloomfield or West Bloomfield, your case will be heard in the 48th District Court located at 4280 Telegraph Road in Bloomfield Hills. What happens in that courtroom depends heavily on which of the three judges is assigned to your case and how well your attorney knows this specific court.

The Barone Defense Firm has appeared in the 48th District Court hundreds of times over more than three decades,  and no firm in Michigan knows this court better. If you are facing a 48th District Court Bloomfield Hills DUI charge, the firm you hire should have appeared in this building hundreds of times, and the Barone Defense Firm has.

What Is the 48th District Court and Which Communities Does It Serve?

Continue Reading ›