Collateral consequences are the loss of rights a person suffers after being convicted of a crime. They have previously been described as having the potential to cause “civil death.” Such consequences are different from the punishments that might be imposed by a judge as part of a criminal case. This is because collateral consequences are not found in criminal statutes. Instead, they often arise out of the myriad civil statutes or civil consequences that are triggered by the criminal conviction. This means that most collateral consequences require no judge to impose them, and they afford no opportunity for due process.
Most crimes are punishable by a statutorily allowed maximum period of prison or jail time. For example, a standard, first offense drunk driving in Michigan, carries with it the possibility of up to 93 days in jail. However, for cases involving a test result of .17 or above, the maximum penalty increases to 180 days. In a drunk driving causing death, charged as second-degree murder, is punishable by life in the state prison, or any term of years. These specific statutory maximums are significant because a criminal lawyer advising her client about a conviction can usually predict, at least within a range, the actual time a client will spend behind bars. The same is most certainly not true of collateral consequences.
A case addressing this is United States v. Nesbeth, 188 F.Supp.3d 179 (2016). Nesbeth was convicted of importation of cocaine and possession of cocaine with intent to distribute. The advisory guidelines would have allowed a sentence of between 33 and 41 years in prison, but because of the significant collateral consequences, the judge saw fit to give him no jail at all, meaning straight probation. The opinion explaining why should be required reading for all criminal defense attorneys.
Michigan Criminal Defense Lawyer Blog
