Published on: | by

What Is the Difference Between a Question of Law and a Question of Fact?

Question of Law vs Question of Fact: Why the Distinction Matters in Michigan DUI Cases

Short answer: The distinction between a question of law vs question of fact is fundamental to understanding how a Michigan DUI case is decided. A question of fact asks what happened. A question of law asks what rules apply and what those rules mean. In a jury trial, the judge explains the law and the jury generally decides disputed facts bearing on guilt. But that is only the starting point: judges also decide facts when ruling on preliminary issues, and a judge decides both law and facts in a bench trial.[1]

Continue Reading ›

Published on: | by
DUI immigration consequences in Michigan are often misunderstood. For someone who is not a United States citizen, a drunk driving arrest can raise questions extending far beyond the criminal courtroom. Will I be deported? Could I lose my green card? Will this prevent me from becoming a citizen? What happens if I travel outside the United States?These are important questions, but they do not all have the same answer. Under current federal immigration law, a single alcohol-only DUI conviction ordinarily does not, by itself, make someone deportable. Nevertheless, even an arrest that does not result in a conviction can sometimes create significant immigration problems.In Michigan, the offense commonly called DUI is generally referred to as Operating While Intoxicated, or OWI. Michigan law determines the criminal offense, while federal immigration law determines what immigration consequences may follow. Understanding the relationship between these two areas of law is essential before deciding how to resolve a criminal charge.

Continue Reading ›

Published on: | by

Short Answer

A Michigan DUI for financial professionals can affect licensing, employment, and reputation, but different credentials carry different reporting requirements. A Michigan insurance producer generally must report a criminal prosecution to DIFS within 30 days after the initial pretrial hearing date. By contrast, an ordinary alcohol-only misdemeanor DUI generally is not reportable under the criminal-disclosure questions on FINRA Form U4. CFP Board has a separate reporting rule that expressly covers a second or subsequent alcohol- or drug-related offense.

The same person may hold an insurance producer license, securities registrations, and CFP certification, each governed by different rules. The first priority after a Michigan DUI arrest is to identify the actual charge, the procedural status of the case, each relevant credential, and any applicable employer requirements before making disclosures or negotiating a plea.

Continue Reading ›

Published on: | by
Short Answer: A substance use evaluation is a clinical assessment conducted by a qualified professional to determine whether a person has an alcohol or drug use disorder and whether treatment would be beneficial. In a Michigan DUI case, an independent evaluation may also help with plea negotiations and sentencing. Obtaining the evaluation early gives the client time to begin any recommended treatment and establish a record of progress before the case reaches sentencing.

Being arrested for drunk driving does not necessarily mean that someone has an alcohol use disorder. An arrest may raise legitimate questions about a person’s relationship with alcohol, but answering those questions requires more than a review of the police report, chemical test results and prior record. A qualified evaluator considers the person’s drinking history, health, personal circumstances, and other clinical information before reaching a conclusion.

At the Barone Defense Firm, we frequently recommend a private substance use evaluation early in the representation. The evaluation can help us understand whether treatment would be appropriate and, when necessary, begin developing a sentencing mitigation strategy. It may also help the client recognize and address problems that extend beyond the criminal case.

Continue Reading ›

Published on: | by

For most people facing criminal charges in Michigan, their first court appearance is an arraignment, a proceeding that places them in an unfamiliar and often intimidating world. The language and rules are foreign, and the proceedings seem governed by customs everyone understands except them.

What makes the experience particularly frightening for our clients is finding themselves there as a criminal defendant, a role is usually profoundly inconsistent with your sense of who you are. Although an arraignment may last only a few minutes, what happens can have significant consequences for the rest of your case.

A Michigan criminal arraignment serves several purposes. It provides formal notice of the criminal accusation, establishes the conditions of any applicable bond, and in the most serious felonies, also involves a decision about whether the accused will remain in custody or be released while the case proceeds. For someone charged with drunk driving, a firearm offense, a sex crime, or another Michigan criminal offense, understanding this first step can reduce uncertainty and help avoid mistakes.

Continue Reading ›

Published on: | by
A serum blood alcohol test performed by a hospital is not the same measurement as the whole-blood alcohol concentration used in a Michigan DUI prosecution. The hospital ordinarily measures alcohol in serum or plasma for clinical treatment. The prosecution then seeks to translate that medical result into an “equivalent” whole-blood BAC.That translation is not a direct measurement. It is a second scientific estimate built on top of the first measurement. Unless the prosecution can establish the reliability of the hospital assay, justify the conversion method for the individual patient, and quantify the combined uncertainty of both steps, the converted number should not be admitted as reliable proof of a particular whole-blood alcohol concentration.

Short answer: A hospital serum result may show that ethanol was detected and may have clinical value. But it does not, by itself, establish the driver’s whole-blood BAC. A prosecution number produced by applying a population conversion factor must include a scientifically defensible uncertainty range that accounts for the hospital measurement and the conversion itself.

A Serum Blood Alcohol Test Answers a Different Question

Continue Reading ›

Published on: | by
Clients often ask how long it takes for DUI charges to be filed after an arrest in Michigan. There is no single number of days that applies to every case. Some Michigan DUI cases move into court almost immediately, while others can remain in the period between arrest and formal charging for weeks or longer, particularly when the prosecutor is waiting for a blood or toxicology result.The important point is that being released without a ticket, court date, or immediate charge does not mean the case has gone away. In Michigan, the statutory term for DUI is operating while intoxicated, or OWI, and the procedure used to begin an OWI case depends on how the police and prosecutor proceed after the arrest.

What Happens After a Michigan DUI Arrest?

Continue Reading ›

Published on: | by

A fatal intoxicated-driving crash can expose a driver to one of Michigan’s most serious felony prosecutions. But the fact that alcohol or drugs were involved, even when combined with a death, does not automatically transform an OWI causing death case into second-degree murder.

Continue Reading ›

Published on: | by

Michigan hospital blood results can become evidence in a DUI case even when medical personnel drew the blood for treatment before the driver was arrested. Michigan’s statutory term is operating while intoxicated, or OWI, although most people search for this issue as DUI. The prosecutor’s ability to obtain the result depends on why the blood was drawn, what happened before the hospital transport, who requested the result, and precisely what the hospital disclosed.

Hospital blood results in a Michigan DUI case reviewed for a warrant issueThe controlling Michigan Supreme Court decision remains People v. Perlos. It upheld the statutory procedure in 1990. More recent Fourth Amendment law creates a principled basis for challenging the statute as unconstitutional as applied to the warrantless acquisition of private medical information and for asking the Michigan Supreme Court to reconsider Perlos. But no controlling decision has displaced Perlos. A careful defense must therefore develop the constitutional challenge while also testing whether the prosecution satisfied the statute in the first place.

Continue Reading ›

Published on: | by

What Is Involuntary Intoxication Under Michigan Law?

Continue Reading ›
Contact Information
280 N Old Woodward Ave #200
Birmingham, MI 48009
Toll Free: 1-877-ALL-MICH (877-255-6424) Phone: 248-306-9158
2155 Butterfield Dr #305A
Troy, MI 48084
Toll Free: 1-877-ALL-MICH (877-255-6424) Phone: 248-306-9158
39 S Main St #20
Clarkston, MI 48346
Toll Free: 1-877-ALL-MICH (877-255-6424) Phone: 248-306-9158
The Federal Eastern District Court for Michigan has courthouses located in Ann Arbor, Flint, Port Huron, and Bay City, whereas the Western District Court also has courthouses located in Lansing, Kalamazoo, and Marquette in Michigan's Upper Peninsula. View More

California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA) Opt-Out IconYour Privacy Choices Cookie Policy Manage Cookies

Please do not include any confidential or sensitive information in a contact form, text message, or voicemail. The contact form sends information by non-encrypted email, which is not secure. Submitting a contact form, sending a text message, making a phone call, or leaving a voicemail does not create an attorney-client relationship.

Copyright © 2026, Barone Defense Firm
JUSTIA Law Firm Blog Design